Showing posts with label Sara article. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sara article. Show all posts

Sunday, January 30, 2022

The Real Story Behind "She Came in Through the Bathroom Window"


 The Real Story Behind “She Came in Through the Bathroom Window”

By Sara Schmidt

 

                The story behind The Beatles song, “She Came in Through the Bathroom Window” is well known by fans.  Paul repeats the story often and it is even in his book Lyrics.    The story goes like this:  There were a group of girls that always hung around outside of Paul’s house on Cavendish Avenue.  They were called The Apple Scruffs.   One day, when Paul and Linda were out of town, the girls noticed that the window on the top floor of Paul’s house was left open.   They were able to open the gate and went onto his property and saw there was a ladder leaning up near the open window.   The girls climbed up the ladder,  went through the window, and landed inside of Paul’s bathroom.   While they were inside of his house, they took Paul’s trousers and other dirty clothes as well as many carousels of photo slides taken by Linda.   These slides included photos of Paul and Linda’s wedding, Paul and his family on holiday, and photos of the Beatles during the Get Back sessions.    Once Paul learned about all of this, he wrote the song and recorded it for the “Abbey Road” album.

                While that might be the story that has been told, it is not the true story behind the song.  If you have watched the “Get Back” documentary, then you will have heard The Beatles rehearsing the song in January 1969.   Therefore, the song had to have been written prior to that date.   Already the facts do not add up with the “official story.”   If the fans stole photos from the Get Back Sessions and Paul and Linda’s wedding then how can Paul write a song about something that hadn’t happened yet?

The story behind the song is a story that was told by The Moody’s Blues member, Mike Pender.   Mike said that an incident happened to fellow band member, Ray Thomas where a girl had climbed through the bathroom window of his home and got into bed with Ray and spent the night.   The day after this happened, the Moody Blue’s members were telling Paul McCartney this crazy story.  Paul had a guitar in his hand and he started to strum and sing “She came in through the bathroom window….”  

In September 1969, John Lennon was interviewed about the songs on the Abbey Road album and he had this to say about the song, “"It was when Paul and I went to America to publicize Apple about two years ago, and we were just in the flat we were staying in and he just came out with that line, 'she came in through the bathroom window.' So, he had it for years, and he eventually finished it."   John remembers Paul working on the song when he and Paul were in New York City in May 1968.    John was asked about the song again when he was interviewed by Playboy for the 1980 interview.   He said, That was written by Paul when we were in New York forming Apple, and he first met Linda. Maybe she's the one who came in the window. She must have. I don't know. Somebody came in the window." 

                This does not mean that no one ever broke into Paul’s house.   Last year I read a book that had a chapter about how a young girl and her friends broke into Paul’s house in 1970 and took photos of themselves in the various rooms of the home.    Fans going into Paul McCartney’s home without his permission seemed to be an ongoing issue in the late 1960s and early 1970s.  One group of fans must have gotten into his house while he took Linda and Heather on holiday to Portugal in December of 1968.   This would explain why he says something about how this recently happened to him before starting to practice “She Came in Through the Bathroom Window” during rehearsals in Twickenham in early January.     

                The next part of this story that is untrue is the statement that The Apple Scruffs went into Paul’s home through the bathroom window.   The group of tight-nit fans that named themselves “The Apple Scruffs” started using the name in the Autumn of 1969 AFTER the Abbey Road album had been released.   That small group of fans were not the type that would break into Paul’s home and take his personal property.  They loved the Beatles and made sure not to cause them harm.    It is an insult to those particular girls that Paul and others flippantly say that they were thieves.  

                The event that is often believed to be the inspiration for the song happened in June of 1969 while Paul and Linda were gone (I personally believe the date most likely was June 15 – Father’s Day due to the weather and day of the week that had been told during the various tellings of the story, but that is just an educated guess).    There were several groups of fans that spent their time outside of Cavendish Avenue at that time.   They were not all friends with one another and there was some of the typical “girl drama” that tends to go on along with groups of young women.   One of those groups of girls really disliked Linda and went out of their way to do cruel things toward her.   It is believed that it is this group that took the items from the home.   Most stories say that a girl named “Diane” or “Little Di” is the person that physically climbed the ladder and landed in the bathroom sink on the upper floor of the McCartney family house.   However, I have seen other names of girls that went up the ladder.    Whoever she was, she went inside and then supposedly let the other girls into the home.   While there the small group of three girls went through the house and went through Paul’s clothing.   Diane gave an interview in the 1990s for a French Beatles fans magazine and said this, “I didn’t take anything that has value, nothing but memories. I searched his basket of dirty laundry and took some shirts that had tea stains.  We took one each.  We looked in the closet and saw all the costumes:  Sgt. Pepper and shoes with the pointed tips he wore in the beginning. We did not touch.”   

                More than just dirty shirts were taken from the home.   Slides of photographs taken by Linda were also stolen and also a photo of Linda and Paul in a nice frame (Paul and Carol Bedford claim it was a photo of his father) was taken.   Paul was not too bothered by the missing clothes, but he really wanted to get Linda’s photographs back.   He spoke directly to a few of the girls that would eventually be in the Apple Scruffs and asked them to help him.  They were eventually returned to Paul, but not before copies of the photos were made.   These photos, which we still see to this day, were sold outside of EMI studios on Abbey Road while hundreds of fans stood outside to catch a glimpse of John, Paul, George, or Ringo before or after a recording session.



Photo of Paul taken by Linda McCartney.  This is an example of one of the photos that had been stolen from Paul's home that had been taken by Linda. 


                It is very possible that this big break-in, which happened just prior to the recording of “She Came in Through the Bathroom Window” as it appears on the Abbey Road Album reminded Paul of the song that he had begun working on the previous year.  It very could be why he brought it back to The Beatles and it was included on the album.   However, it is a crazy coincidence that Diane (or whoever) climbed a ladder and went through the bathroom window, just as the girl did with the Moody Blue’s member years before.   Simply put, the event in the early summer of 1969 was not the original inspiration for the song, but perhaps the inspiration to bring the song back and record. 

 

                I am sure that Paul gets his stories confused easily because that is how our minds work when it comes to memories.   As humans, we frequently combine events that happen at the same place during the same time period.  Paul is not trying to be a Beatles historian, but just remembering things that happened in his life.   I do not believe he is purposely trying to give the girls in the Apple Scruffs a bad name, but sadly that is what has happened.   I asked one of them if I could write something to attempt to right this wrong.   She said she would be happy if I did.   Today the truth is on the new Apple Scruffs webpage and hopefully, upcoming books, such as Mark Lewisohn’s biography (volume 3) will contain the correct information.   

Sunday, April 1, 2018

John Lennon's many wives




I have discovered that John Lennon was a polygamist.   It is unknown the number of wives he actually had.   Cynthia was his first wife and he married her in 1962.   She was his legal wife.  However, wedding ceremonies were performed with at least 2 other brides.    This one pictured here was from April 1964 and was to a girl named Jeni (last name unknown at this time).     It is said that he met her one night during the making of A Hard Day's Night.     John approached her about being his second wife and she loved the idea of being married to a Beatle.     Cynthia was not so keen on the idea and so Jeni lived in a flat in London.    In 1965 John took his 3rd bride, who we think is named Marsha (or Marcha).    John met her during the filming of Help!    Marsha moved in with Jeni.   

It is my understanding that the other Beatles knew that John had more than one wife and they did not approve but thought John should be allowed to do whatever he wanted.     John gave George the line in the song "Taxman" which said "There's one for you nineteen for me" because John ultimately wanted to have 20 wives.   (19 plus the one legal wife) but George was happy with just one wife, Pattie.

Once Yoko came into the picture, she wanted to be the #1 legal wife.    Once John met Yoko, he slowly gave up his idea of having 20 wives and decided to divorce Cyn and make Yoko the legal wife.   He tried to talk Cyn into staying on as one of his wives, but since she never liked the idea in the first place, she left.   Soon afterward, John ended all communication with Jeni and Marsha (Marcha?).   We would never know about this if Jeni hadn't recently come forward with this photograph along with her story. 






APRIL FOOLS!    Of course, John Lennon only had one wife at a time and this is just a photo that a fan made in the 1960's.    I am sure I didn't fool anyone, but it is fun to write a little bit of fiction now and then.   I  hope you all had a great day!


Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Beatlemania Hits L.A.

A little while ago I had the privilege of talking on the phone with a first generation fan name Kay.  Kay has had quite an adventure as a Beatles fan because in 1965 she was one of the girls that rented a helicopter that flew over the Beatles' rented house which lead to her and her friends being invited to the Beatles' press conference.    

She is allowing me to share her story from 1964 about her experience with Beatlemania.   She is working on a project right now that will go into more details about how experiences. 


In August of 1964, Beatlemania was running wild throughout the globe and the effects of it were felt in Los Angeles, California.      The Beatles hadn't been to the west coast as a group  yet and the fans were chomping at the bit to see them.      Radio stations, such as KRLA were playing their music and the release of their first movie,  A Hard Day's Night just added to the excitement.   The Beatles  not only would perform twice at the Hollywood Bowl, but would be spending a few days in a mansion in Bel-Air.


Crafty Beatle fans in the area learned where the house was and tired in vain to get inside the gates.   When they were stopped by police, they returned back to the gates and waited with hopes of seeing the Beatles coming and going.



One group of fans that camped outside of the Bel-Air house was a group of girls in the  Beatles Boosters Fan club:  Paula, Kay, Mickie, Sue R., Darlene, Sue S., and Yvonne.    They had hopes that they would see the Beatles and they were in luck at noon when they saw the Beatles limo coming out of the gate.   Not happy with just seeing the limo, the group piled into a 1963 Continental and started to chase the Beatles' limo down the highway.    At one point they were going 83 miles an hour in pursuit of the Fab 4!    And the cops were on their tail with lights flashing, but that did not stop them.  
The finally got close to the Beatles car and pulled up next to it.   George Harrison rolled down his window and Mickie threw a scroll that was signed by the fan club into the car!    The girls did eventually get a ticket from the police, but I would say that it was well worth it for that experience!

I am sure there are more details I have left out, but I want to hold off for Kay's project so she can elaborate more.

Here is a photo of the girls in the car with the ticket that appeared in the newspaper. 

Much thanks goes out to Kay for sharing her story with me and sending me the photo form the L.A. Times archives.  

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

5 Reasons why Paul McCartney is worth seeing in a stadium---at least once!

Photo by Coral Schmidt 


Tonight for Wednesday Review I am going to talk about the Paul McCartney concert I saw at Busch Stadium in St. Louis on August 13, 2016.    As I have said before, since Paul McCartney can do no wrong in my eyes, it isn't fair for me to "review" a Paul concert.   I am a Beatles fan.  I love Paul McCartney--obviously you do too and you will most likely agree with me, that his concerts are awesome.  

I was able to again see Paul arrive at the venue and saw him quickly (the fastest ever!) drive by and wave to the extremely small group of fans gathered around.   Why was it such a small group?   Well, a big group had gathered and then some guy texted his buddy who worked security inside the stadium and asked if McCartney had arrived yet.   His friend texted back that Paul was inside.   The news quickly spread and a lot of fans dispersed.    However, a few of us "Fans on the Run" loyals were suspicious of that news, because we saw police setting up more barricades, and so we waited about 15 more minutes and low and behold---here he came!    I got nervous and only snapped a photo of a police guard, but luckily my mom got a decent shot of the moment.

Photo by Coral Schmidt


My opinion is that Paul's voice sounded much stronger than it had in April in Little Rock.   "Maybe I'm Amazed" was still rough and I still think needs to be cut from his set, but other songs such as "You won't see me" were spot on and sounded great.   However, the audience in Little Rock was much, much better than the audience in St. Louis.    If it wasn't a Beatles song, the St. Louis crowd didn't like it---and I should point out if it wasn't a Beatles song that they knew.     The guy behind me kept a running commentary for me to know what he thought of each song.   He would often say things like "Finally a Beatles song!"   I know "In spite of all the danger" is a Quarry Men song, but it is on a Beatles' album, so I thought it should be considered a Beatles song.   And rude of all was after Paul was explaining how he had written "Here Today" as a conversation with John that he never had, people decided en mass to take a potty break during the song in tribute to John Lennon.   How disrespectful.      But it is their loss, because I personally had an amazing time!

People told me over and over that I would not enjoy seeing Paul at a stadium and while stadium concerts sure have their issues, I am going to let you know why I think all fans should experience Paul McCartney in a stadium setting---at least once!


Photo by Sara Schmidt 


5.   It is an outdoor concert.    There is just something fun about seeing a concert outdoors at night.  The atmosphere is different.   And as long as you have decent weather and a nice breeze, it can be a great experience.   Paul McCartney under the stars--you can't beat that!




4.   Live and Let Die    If you have ever experienced a Paul McCartney concert since 1976, you will know that the song "Live and Let Die" is a sight to be seen.   The pyrotechnics is amazing.   Well if you see Paul at a stadium, it is ten times bigger than it is in an arena!   The fireworks go off and the fire is blazing.   Photos and video does not do it it justice.  Really--it is something you have to be there and experience yourself!


Photo by Sara Schmidt 



3.  The Sound.   The Beatles had a terrible experience with the sound system in large stadiums in the 1960's.   Thankfully times have changed and the sound system has improved greatly over the years.   I thought the whole concert sounded better in the stadium than in an arena.   There was a bit of an echo and I liked that as well.  


2. You get to hear the soundcheck for FREE.    With an outdoor venue, it is easy to hear what is going on in the stadium on the outside of the venue.   I saw on the news that many people that weren't able to get tickets to the concert, stood outside and listened to it and some were standing in the right spot to even be able to see the big screens.     Well---I did the same thing, but with the soundcheck.  I couldn't see anything, but I heard the entire soundcheck while sitting at the 3rd base entrance.   I got to hear songs like "On my way to work" and "Let 'em in" that I wouldn't have heard otherwise.   Sure being at the soundcheck is awesome, but hearing it was the next best thing.


Photo by Sara Schmidt 
1.  Sharing the moment.   During the song "Let it Be" everyone traditionally gets out their cell phones and shines the light in the way that oldtimes will remember doing with a lighter.    I was on the field and I turned around and saw 40,000 people all shining their lights around the stadium.  It was enough to give you goosebumps.     There I was---sharing this moment with all of these other people that love Paul McCartney and the song "Let it Be."     Paul was touched too because he stated, "thank you for all the lights."      That was something that I had never experienced in the arena setting and I am glad to have been there for it.


Yes, there are a LOT of reasons why arena shows are better than stadium shows.   But stadium shows are worth a try--at least once!


Tuesday, August 2, 2016

4 Reasons why People in America were so upset by John Lennon's "Jesus Statement"

4 Reasons why People in America were so upset by John Lennon’s “Jesus Statement”
By Sara Schmidt
August 2, 1966


                50 years ago The Beatles’ music was banned and countess Beatles’ records were burned as a response to a statement John Lennon made to an English newspaper.   John’s “Jesus statement” controversy has been analyzed and written about numerous times over the years that there is no need to rehash the story; however, what I wanted to understand is WHY Americans got so upset over a remark made by a pop star in a teen magazine.  But before we discover why, let’s look at a little background information first.

                Maureen Cleeve was a journalist and friend of the Beatles.  During the spring of 1965, she interviewed all four Beatles and Brian Epstein separately at their homes for a series of articles that were published in the London Evening Standard in March of 1966.   Parts of John’s article, which included his quote about Jesus, was also published in the San Francisco Chronicle that same month.    Tony Barrow offered the four Beatles articles to Art Unger of Datebook magazine.  The Beatles particularly liked Datebook because it was much more progressive than the other teen magazines of the day.   It featured stories about race relations, teenage pregnancy and the effects of LSD among the latest news about music and film stars.    Unger purchased the rights to the articles and saved the stories on John and Paul for the September 1966 issue, which came out on July 31, 1966.   This issue was called the “shout-out” issue and it featured proactive quotes from seven people including John Lennon and Paul McCartney.


                In Birmingham, Alabama WAQY radio DJ’s Tommy Charles and Doug Layton went on the air talking about what John Lennon had said in Datebook as part of their morning show.   They regularly read headlines from newspapers and magazines and discussed them.   They made a decision after receiving a few calls from listeners to ban all Beatles records on their radio station.  A reporter from UPI heard the broadcast and wrote about the Beatle banning in a story that was published in newspapers around the country.   As the story spread, more radio stations banned the Beatles’ music.  Teenagers started to express anger over what was said.   Beatle burnings were planned for former fans to get rid of their Beatles collections and the Ku Klux Klan were burning Beatles records that were nailed onto crosses and speaking out against the band.



                Why was there such a furor?   Why did so many Americans get so upset by a pop star saying that his band is more popular than Jesus.?

1.         Most people neither understood what John said nor what he meant
A lot of Americans, including Tommy Charles, never read the Maureen Cleeve article.  While Datebook printed the article in its entirety (except for the introduction), the people only heard the most shocking parts.  John said that the Beatles were “more popular than Jesus;” however, many believed he said that the Beatles were “bigger than Jesus,” which has a totally different meaning.  They did not understand that John was not talking about people in America, but was speaking about the Church of England, which had seen a drastic decline in numbers.  






2.        They took John’s statement personally and they were hurt by it.
One girl who was interviewed by Richard Lindly for the ITV news story, “Reporting ‘66” really explained this when she said, “A lot of people are ‘good Baptists’ down here.  Everythign about religion they take very personally.”    In the same story, another girl tells Lindly, “It hurt people’s feelings. People used to think so much of them because they were for the teenager and everybody thought they were so good.  And then they came out with something like this.  It sounds like they are making fun of everything we like.”    One girl was asked by a reporter in St. Louis, Missouri about her thoughts on the matter and she said, “I liked the Beatles when they first came out, but when they said what they did about Christ, I was hurt and I don’t care for them anymore.”  

The people who felt this way were fans that admired The Beatles, but also considered themselves Christians.  They felt that by saying that by saying that the Beatles were more popular than Jesus that John was bragging that the Beatles were better than Christ, an idea that insulted their core beliefs.   It hurt their feelings and angered them.  In some places teens were forced between The Beatles and Jesus, a choice that they blamed The Beatles for making them have to choose.




3.        It was Anti-American
At first glance, the thought of a group of British singers being called “Anti-American” is laughable.  However, those who felt this way were very serious.   From their point of view, the Beatles became popular and made all of their money because of their American fans.  John’s statement was an insult to Christian and therefore towards America, the place that made them famous.   In “Reporting ‘66” one girl adamantly proclaimed, “I’m a Christian!  So many people have built buildings in the name of Christ.  What have the Beatles done for us?  We’ve done more for them!  We don’t owe them a thing.  We shouldn’t just sit back and take it.”   One person wrote a letter to the Chattanooga Free Press stating, “Americans favor the bais of the religion that founded our country, not a group of young men suffering from a serious lack of responsibility, respect and Moravian conviction.”    And one woman named Patti told the Desert News, “It is disgusting how the Beatles think they are so cool that they can say anything they want about the religious beliefs of the majority of Americans then come over to our country and take in fabulous sums of money.  They seem to think that they can trample over us and in everything we believe in and still be put on a golden pedestal for us to admire and worship as idols.”  




4.        The statement John Lennon made would turn teenagers into atheists and communists. 
In 1966 America, 98% of the  adult citizens said they believed in God.   Times were changing and there was a fear that the next generation would turn their back on religion.  In April of that year Time magazine’s cover declared, “God is Dead,” which did not help this fear.   Closely linked to atheism was the fear of communism.   While the “red scare” of the 1950’s had mostly died down, there was still some lingering fear, especially in the Southern states that communism would one day take over the United States.   Knowing that pop stars held a strong influence on teenagers, many of the older generation feared for their children’s future after hearing about John’s remarks.  A man named Raymond told the Dessert News, “If what John Lennon said is what the Beatles believe, their belief is a high degree of atheism.   If this is so, then they should keep their beliefs to themselves while in the U.S.”   Robert Shelton, the grand wizard of the KKK told Lindly, “These individuals want to vilify Christ and come to America and still continue collecting sums of money.  I think this is a dangerous trend because I think they are concerned with the development of socialism which once you have socialism in action, it graduated into communism.



50 years later these ideas seem somewhat silly.  Many people got swept up in the drama of it all and followed the crowd.  There are some who anonymously today confess that they threw their Beatles albums in the fire during the excitement of the moment only to regret it and purchase them all over again in the following weeks.

                There were also Americans that did not approve of the boycotts.  Loyal fans that agreed or didn’t care what John said and continued to purchase Beatles records and defend the Beatles in magazines and newspapers come out in droves to support the Fab 4.  



                There also was a group of people that disliked what John said.  They thought he was an arrogant jerk for making such a bold statement, but they also believed that he had the right to state his opinion without being terrorized or boycotted.  As one girl in St. Louis said, “It’s his opinion and it’s wrong, but since it is his opinion they shouldn’t band their records and things.”  And another said, “I thought it was a rather vain thing for him to say, but I don’t think it should affect his performance any.”

                50 years later John’s Jesus statement is still something that is discussed and written about.  In 2010 the Vatican made an announcement that the Church forgave John for saying  such a statement.   


                It is hard to believe that such a small statement could make such a controversy; however this phenomenon happens with people even more so today with the advent of the internet.   

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

The Long and Winding road to the Anthology (part 2)

If you have been following things here for the past month, you will know that I recently found a notebook that has the beginning of a book I thought I was going to write 10 years ago about the Beatles Anthology project.     When I read over what I had, I thought it was some interesting information and decided to post it in the form of articles on my blog.  However, these articles come with a warning:   I have not edited or double checked anything.   I am just typing it up as I found it.  I think a lot of the information came from Badman's book---which isn't the best source, but also isn't the worst.    Maybe one of these days I can give this stuff the proper treatment, but for now I am presenting it how I wrote it 10 years ago.  




The Long and Winding Road to the Beatles’ Anthology:   The 1970’s
By Sara Schmidt
 

                By Christmas of 1970, fans were disappointed that the Beatles documentary film, The Long and Winding Road had not materialized.   Of course, they were not yet aware of the complex legal issues that would put a stop to the film for the next 25 years.   On November 15, 1970, the legal issues began when Paul McCartney filed a lawsuit against John Lennon, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and Apple to dissolve the Beatles.  Things got worse in early December when Paul and George met in New York City and got into an intense argument over the lawsuit.   This argument supposedly was the catalyst for Paul to further is lawsuit to dissolve the Beatles and on December 31, 1970 a request was made that a receiver for Apple be appointed until the case was settled.    With Paul suing the Beatles and Apple, he was no longer willing to participate in the “Long and Winding road” film project.  Neil Aspinall had no choice but to shelf the project for all of 1971 and most of 1972.


Paul and Linda during a court hearing

                George spoke of this in a 1995 interview on Today-Tonight, “This film has been around in various forms for –well since 1969.  And it laid there for years.  It was tentatively called “the Long and Winding Road,” but at that time everyone was annoyed at each other.   We were all splitting up.  We were tired of being in the Beatles.”

                Unexpectedly in November 1972, apple made an announcement about the film.   According to the statement, Apple said that they are comping a film entitled, “Ten Years in the Life of the Beatles.”  This is the first time the film wasn’t referred to as “The Long and Winding Road.”  Ringo Starr was quoted as saying at the time, “We are getting together all the clips we own to show the change in our music and our attitudes to life.  It’s kind of All our Yesterdays.”

Ringo Starr in late 1972

                There isn’t much information about how much work was done on the project during this time.  It also isn’t clear how much input the individual Beatles had on the film during 1972, but from what Ringo said in November, each of the Beatles were going through his personal archives for footage to add to the film.  Apple must have thought the film was almost ready in November because the final part of the announcement said that the movie would be released in cinemas in early 1973 along with a Beatles Greatest Hits package. 

                However, 1973 came along and there was not any more information about the release.  However, in March of 1973 a meeting was held in Los Angeles with John, George and Ringo.   One of the topics of discussion was the double albums known to fans as the “Red” and “Blue” albums.  John  was  not pleased with the compilations and during the meeting, discussions were held about postponing the release.  However, the two albums:  Beatles 1962-1966 and Beatles 1967-1970 were available in stores on April 2, 1973.  While the promised “Greatest Hits” album was out, the documentary film was never mentioned.  

                By 1974, the four members of the band were beginning to get along once again.  Legal matters were starting to be settled and they were working on Ringo’s solo album, even if separately.   It would not seem too far-fetched to see the film released during 1974, especially when Paul McCartney said on February 25, “As soon as things are sorted out we can all get together again and do something.  We’ve talked about it, but haven’t been able to do anything because this has been going on.”  No one was certain what that “something” Paul was referring to, but the film project would have been a big possibility.

                On November 16, 1974, John Lennon appeared on the U.S. morning talk show, “Today.”   He spoke on many subjects including the mystery documentary.  He said, “There is a film in the offing that’s comprised of all the films we’ve collected from all the tours and all the interviews over the world, which will be called ‘the Long and Winding road’ no doubt.”  Hope was even stronger at the end of the year at Disneyworld.   At this happy place, John was the last member of the Beatles to sign the papers that dissolved the group.  It wasn’t until April 9, 1975 that the London high court announced, “All matters in the dispute between Mr. McCartney and John Lennon, George Harrison and Ringo Starr have been fully settled.”   While the legal issues between Paul and the other three were settled, they still were not legally free to work on any project because of the legal issues between Apple and Allen Klein, which would not be fully settled until January of 1977.

                Between 1975 and 1976, Neil Aspinall continued to work on the documentary.  At this point the film was 90 minutes long and included gems such as the Dezo Hoffman home video footage, Beatles home movies from India and other rare discoveries.   When Neil was finished in late 1976, he sent one copy of each Beatle to show them current version of the film.       

Neil at work at Apple in the 1970's

                Elsewhere in Great Britain two comedians, Eric Idle and Neil Innes were working on a television program called “Rutland Weekend Television.” One of the skits for the second season of the show featured a Beatlesque song called “I must be in love.”  Eric Idle, wanting to make an inexpensive sketch, got the idea to make a short that parodied the Beatles in “A Hard Day’s night” using the black and white style of the Beatles first movie.   On October 2, 1976 Idle went to New York City and was the host of Saturday Night Live.  He brought along some of the shorts from his Rutland Weekend Television program.  The audience had the best reaction to the Beatles' parody.   By the time Eric Idle returned to SNL, this time bringing Neil Innes with him, on April 23, 1977, the Beatles’ parody, now known as the Rutles, was a popular reoccurring sketch on their program.  When they did a Rutles sketch on SNL, it again had a great response from the audience.  Idle talked to SNL producer, Lorne Michaels about his idea of making a mock Rutles documentary for the BBC.  Michaels loved the idea and said that Idle should do the film for him on NBC.  So the Rutles documentary, “All you Need is Cash” was conceived.
the Rutles-- I must be in love


                George Harrison was good friends with Eric Idle and Neil Innes and he loved the idea behind the Rutles documentary so much that he wanted to be involved in the project.  George appeared in the movie as a news reporter.  However, George also provided Neil Innes with a very important key to making the Rutles documentary look authentic.  Harrison lent Innes his copy of the 1976 version of the Beatles Long and Winding Road documentary film.


                The 1976 version of the Beatles film was used exclusively for the feel and layout of “All you Need is Cash.  The Rutles movie showed several re-created scenes that were actually in the Beatles’ version.  The clothing, movements and camera angle of the Rutles match the Beatles to a tee.  One identical scene is the 1963 home movie footage shot by Dezo Hoffman where the Beatles are racing Go-Karts.  However, these details were lost on most Beatle fans in 1978, because much of the footage had never been see by the public.  The mentioned Dezo Hoffman home movies were first shown on television in the U.K on “The Tube” television program in 1980.


                The Rutles did more than just recreate scenes from the Long and Winding road, they used actually footage from the unseen documentary, apparently, with the Beatles approval according to an interview Neil Innes gave to Q Magazine in 1996.  “The Beatles were very good about it.  They allowed us to use lots of their old footage, stuff that eventually became the bones of the Anthology and inter-cut it with newly filmed Rutles sequences to give it more authenticity.”

The Rutles performing Get up and Go

                With all of the work done to make the Rutles film as much like the Beatles film, one would have thought that when the “mockumentary” premiered on NBC at 9:30pm on March 22, 1978 it would have been a huge success.  But the opposite was true.  All you Need is Cash” was the lowest rated program on U.S. televisions that week.  While it fared better with U.K. audiences, it really is no surprise that the movie bombed.  With the Beatles documentary still in Apple’s vaults and unseen by fans, it was difficult to get what the Rutles were a parody of.   Sure the fans knew the Beatles’ story from reading various books, but in 1978, when things such as the Cavern club performance of ‘Some Other Guy’ had yet to been seen by the public and even the Ed Sullivan performances hadn’t been seen by many fans for 13 years, many of the jokes of the Rutles were hard to comprehend.   Perhaps if the Beatles had released their film prior to 1978, the Rutles movie would have gotten better ratings.   Today “All you need is Cash” has become a favorite film of Beatles fans who now can appreciate the humor.
               
                The late 1970’s was a popular time for the Beatles to be in the news.  In 1977, they had a number one album with “Live at the Hollywood Bowl.”  The rumors of a Beatles reunion were running rampant and promoters were willing to pay millions of dollars for one Beatles concert.   In April of 1978, a board meeting was held to discuss the re-organization of Apple Corps, which lead to more reunion rumors.    With the Beatles being back in the spotlight, talks began yet again about releasing the documentary.  According to Paul McCartney, ten unpersonal form letters to a variety of directors including Spielberg, Scorsese, Michael Apted and Ridley Scott were sent out to see if they were interested in directing the film.   Steven Spielberg, who was making E.T. at the time, recommended Martin Scorsese; however, he was never directly contacted aside from that original letter.  It was then decided that an unknown director would be best, but since no one ever came to mind, the project once again faded away.

                Banking on the Beatles popularity, a Broadway musical called “Beatlemania” opened at the Winter Garden Theatre in New York City on May 26, 1976.  It had a 1006 show run until October 17, 1983.  The Beatles did not approve of the performance and on November 28, 1980, John Lennon wrote a legal statement using the unreleased documentary as a reason for the production to cease.  His statement read, “I and the other three former Beatles have plans to stage a reunion concert, an event to be filmed and included as the finale to “The Long and Winding Road,”  the official Beatles produced documentary that is to be released in the mid-1980’s.”

                Sadly, ten days after writing that statement, John Lennon was murdered, putting a tragically unexpected end to any chance of a reunion of the four Beatles.  It is unknown if John’s statement was based on any plans that were set by the Beatles to release the film along with recording a concert in the mid-1980 or if John made that statement to put an end to the Broadway show.  Regardless of his motives, after his statement was read in court in June 7, 1986, the producers of “Beatlemania” had to pay Apple $10.5 million for using the Beatles’ songs and likeness during that period. 
 


 

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Long and Winding Road to the Beatles Anthology: 1970

As I stated last week, I recently re-discovered a book that I started writing 10 years ago about The Beatles Anthology.    I thought it might be fun to turn the semi-chapters of this rough draft into a few articles on the blog because there is some good information that I discovered when I was researching.    This stuff has been sitting at the bottom of a shelf covered in dust and I felt like for the 20th anniversary of the Anthology release, it was time to see the light of day.    This week's article is about the early days of the Anthology project--the year of 1970.



The Long and Winding Road to the Beatles Anthology:  1970
By Sara Schmidt

                The Beatles’ Anthology project of the mid-1990’s was considered to a second wave of Beatlemania.   However, the origin of the project dates back to the times of original Beatlemania of the 1960’s. 

                As early as 1968, the head of Apple Films, Denis O’Dell, had been collecting records, interviews, film clips and newsreel shots of the Beatles to be used in a future film documentary about the band.   John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Starr had long felt a need to inform the public and their fans the truth behind their story.   In 1968, Hunter Davies wrote the only official Beatles’ biography.  While this book had the blessing of the four Beatles, it still was a watered-down version of the Beatles’ story.  The boys were not very pleased with the outcome of the book and wanted to make a film of their story told by them. 

                That is why Denis O’Dell’s job as head of Apple Films came into existence.  The Beatles gave the project the title “The Long and Winding Road,” named after a new Beatles song written by Paul McCartney.  Dennis kept all of the film footage to use used in the film in canisters in a locked room that the Beatles themselves had decorated by making a college of Beatles photographs taken from newspapers and magazines located in the Apple building on Savile Row in London.

The room with the film canisters.  Notice the wall the Beatles decorated.  
                                    Copyright:  Sara Schmidt   DO NOT TAKE THIS PHOTO!

                The fate of the Beatles  as a band was not very clear as 1969 turned into 1970, but it WAS clear that the Beatles still had plenty of projects to offer.  In February 1970, the New York Times reported that there were two upcoming Beatles films, “Let it Be” and “the Long and Winding Road.”

                Neil Aspinall was officially in charge of the “Long and Winding Road project.”  The film archives were moved to a building in Boston Place.  This building was originally purchased for Magic Alex and Apple Electronics.  When that division of Apple closed, Neil Aspinall moved all of the Beatles’ archives from Savile Row to the new location.   He found a researcher named Nell Burley and the two of them worked through most of 1970 gathering as much information as they could.   The two then edited it all down to a little under two hours long and Neil put the ending credits from the Magical Mystery tour movie to signify the end of the documentary. 

Neil Aspinall

                April 10, 1970 is considered to be officially the day the Beatles broke up because on that date Paul McCartney announced the band’s break up in the self-interview that was included in his self-titled solo album.  However, this announcement did not change any plans on “The Long and Winding Road.”  In fact, on that date George Harrison watched that early version of the film at his Apple office on Savile Row. 

George being interviewed on the day of the break up announcement.   Not sure if that was before or after he watched the documentary

                Apple announced shortly after Paul’s self-interview was released that the “Long and Winding Road” was going to be shown in a split screen format just as the successful Woodstock documentary has been and the Beatles’ documentary was set for cinema release during the Christmas season of 1970.  In the October 1970 issue of the Beatles’ official magazine, Beatles Book Monthly, it was written that Neil Aspinall was close to finishing his work on the official Beatles’ history documentary and Apple still hoped to release it for Christmas.  The article also stated that the film would include footage form the Beatles’ home movies that included shots taken during the Beatles’ time in India with the Maharishi, live performances from Shea Stadium, promo films from the Beatles’ songs and news footage.  Apple also stated that there was hope to have a new Beatles’ album released alongside the documentary which would contain extracts from the “Let it Be” session.

                Fans in 1970 were very excited about the chance to see this footage again.  In the days before VCRs and DVD recorders, most fans had not seen things such as the Ed Sullivan show since it originally had aired six years earlier.   But sadly for fans (and typical for Apple), Christmas of 1970 came and went without the Beatles’ “Long and Winding Road” documentary.